再谈中国数学史研究的两次运动  

Revisiting the Two Movements of Research on China Mathematics History

作　　者：曲安京[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学数学系,陕西西安710069

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2006年第5期100-104,共5页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(项目编号:10471111)

摘　　要：20世纪的中国数学史研究,在李俨与钱宝琮、吴文俊的倡导下,出现了以“发现”和“复原”为主流特征的两次运动。为了回答对20世纪中国数学史研究存在两次运动的提法的质疑,进一步论述了李钱运动中的“复原”研究与吴运动中倡导的“古证复原”的本质差别。20世纪的中国数学史研究范式的转变,可以看作是科学编史学的一个案例,值得认真的对待。Led by Li Yan,QIAN Bao-cong,and Wu Wen-tsun,there are two movements of research on China mathematics history.They respectively feature discovery and recovery.According to the nature of these two movements,a paradigmatic shift has occurred during the last century.Unfortunately,some historians have misunderstood the difference between the meaning of WU's discovery and a few discoveries found in LI and QIAN's jobs.This paper makes a further discussion on the question how WU's paradigm is different from LI and QIAN's.The paradigm changing of research on China mathematics history in last century could be taken as a case study of science historiography.

关 键 词：中国数学史 科学史 范式 科学编史学 

分 类 号：N09[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] O112[理学—数学]