中英两国法学本科教育之比较——以北京大学和剑桥大学为代表  

A Comparison between the Law Education in China and That in Britain: A Case Study of Peking University and Cambridge University

作　　者：马慧娟[1] 陶思宇[1] 严励[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学经济政法学院,云南昆明650092

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2006年第6期90-95,共6页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：云南省教育厅课题<中英法学高等教育比较研究>(项目编号5Y1267G)成果

摘　　要：中国法学教育虽已取得了一定的成就,但与教育发达的英国相比仍然存在着一定的差距。问题有:教学设置“重理论,轻实践”,学生实际操作能力差;教学方法单一,学生缺乏学习的主动性;教学考核方式机械化,考核结果有片面性;教师知识结构单一,忽视法学与其他学科的联系。因此,有必要改革教学内容、采用多元化的教学方法、改革考试方式等对策。Although the law education in China has made some achievements, it still lags behind the United Kingdom. Its problems include the following, the emphasis on theory rather than practice in teaching, the weak practical skills of the students, the lack of variety in teaching, the poor initiation of the students, the mechanical examination, the narrow knowledge of the teacher and the lack of interfiled studies. Thus, reform is needed and the diversity in teaching and in examination should be encouraged.

关 键 词：北京大学 剑桥大学 法学 本科教育 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]