认识检验之旅——中国古代认识真理性检验标准思想探析  

The Journey of Cognition Test——The Analysis for Thoughts on the Test Criterion of the Cognitive Truth Quality in Ancient China

作　　者：李维香[1] 杜吉泽[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学马克思主义学院,山东淄博255049 [2]山东理工大学省职教师资中心,山东淄博255049

出　　处：《管子学刊》2006年第4期79-83,共5页GuanZi Journal

摘　　要：中国古代关于认识真理性检验标准的思想可以大致归纳为四种主要观点。先秦及汉代的唯物主义思想家已经有了把感觉经验和行为效果作为检验认识真理性标准的思想;古代唯心主义思想家则坚持无客观标准论,他们要么直接坚持主观标准论,要么认为根本无是非标准可言;宋、明、清时期的一些唯物主义哲学家提出并坚持以客观事物或事实作为检验认识真理性的标准;与此不同,王廷相、王夫之、颜元等人则提出“行”标准说,这种颇具光辉的哲学思想,使中国古代关于认识真理性检验标准思想的探讨大大前进了一步。The four main viewpoints can approximately be included for the thoughts on the test criterion of the congnitive truth quality in ancient China. The materialist thinkers have had such thoughts that the experience of sensation and the result of conduct acted as the test criterion of the cognitive truth quality before Qin Dynasty and during Han Dynasty; However, the ancient idealist thinkers held on to the argument without the objective criterion, they upheld either the argument of the subjective criterion or the criterion without right and wrong thoroughly; Some materialist philosophers raised and persisted in the test criterion of the cognitive truth quality by means of the objective thingts and the facts during Song, Ming and Qing Dynasty. On the contrary, Wang Tingxiang, Wang Fuzhi and Yan Yuan raised the theory of the practice criterion, so the glorious philosophic thought has made great progress for the discussion on the test criterion of the cognitive truth quality in ancietn China.

关 键 词：认识真理性 检验标准 行为效果 主观认识 客观事物 实践 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]