从标记过度与标记缺失看情状体对习得一般过去时标记的影响  

Lexical Aspect and the Acquisition of the Simple Past Marking——Viewing from Overgeneralization and Undergeneralization

作　　者：牛毓梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《外语教学》2007年第1期65-68,共4页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：山东省政府留学基金资助

摘　　要：本研究从一般过去时标记在使用中存在的问题(标记过度和标记缺失现象)出发对情状体假设作了进一步的验证。本文描述并分析了41篇英语叙述体作文,结果显示,标记过度和标记缺失现象最多出现于状态动词,其次是活动动词,然后是完结动词和达成动词,所反映的习得顺序基本支持情状体假设的第一个习得过程。与情状体假设的不符之处是,本研究中一般过去时标记最先标记终结性动词而非仅仅是瞬时性动词。另外,本文还验证了系动词be作为时态承载动词在习得过程中的特殊性。The present study describes and analyses the inappropriate uses （ overgeneralization and undergeneralization） of the simple past marking in 41 narrative compositions of Chinese English students. The result shows that overgeneralization and undergeneralization appear the most in statives, then activities and finally aecorn p[ishments and achievements. The order of acquisition thus reflected basically supports the first claim of the Aspect Hypothesis. However, there is one inconsistent point,, telic verbs （accomplishments and achievements） instead of just punctual verbs （achievements only） are first marked. The special category of the copular be as a tense carrier is also testified and discussed.

关 键 词：情状体 情状体假设 一般过去时标记 标记过度 标记缺失 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]