向空气中讲空气  

Speaking Air into the Air

作　　者：周诗岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学视觉文化研究中心

出　　处：《时代建筑》2006年第5期82-83,共2页Time + Architecture

摘　　要：每当我们讨论中西方建筑观念的相互作用时，不可避免地牵涉到跨文化交流的问题。然而很多时候我们并没有意识到，交流的模型与交流的内容一样值得观察和讨论。“批评的演化：中西方的交流”一文如同一些类似话题的文章一样，不知觉中滑入两个误区：首先，关键词“交流”的概念错位，使得“双向”代替了“交”作为“流”的限定．从而放弃了对信息流“交相互动”的论证，再者，作者沉浸在交流内容的分析中，缺失对交流模式的审视，因此放弃了对建筑观念跨文化传播的结构性批评。People who talk about＂dialogue＂ are inclined to trap themselves in two kinds of confusion. Firstly, they qualified ＂dialogue＂ with ＂two-way＂ instead of＂interactive＂. For this reason, they give out demonstrating the ＂interaction＂ in the bidirectional communication. For example, Rein Koolhaas°Φs ＂observation into Asia＂, which was regarded as an interactive behavior in Zhu Jianfei＇s article, is more like ＂self-project＂ than a genuine ＂dialogue＂, because Koolhaas had structuralize the autonomic concept before his cross-cultural observation. It is not surprising since, ＂failure of two-way communication＂ is being demonstrated in the fields of Philosophy, Communication and Cross-culture researches. In face of the illusion of＂dialogue＂, maybe ＂take others material, and account in one＇s own words＂ is the most effective strategy, just like what Koolhaas prefers to do.

关 键 词：跨文化交流 空气 建筑观念 相互作用 文化传播 中西方 关键词 信息流 

分 类 号：TU-0[建筑科学—建筑理论]