中国当代艺术史写作的方法论问题  

The Problem of the Methodology of Chinese Contemporary Art History Writing

作　　者：王南溟 

出　　处：《艺术当代》2007年第3期29-30,共2页Art China

摘　　要：一、关于“八五”艺术史写作：表彰大会或悼念活动？ 以艺术史的名义做的当代艺术展和出版的当代艺术读物是这些年来的时尚．它再一次将当代艺术理论写作和批评写作挤到了一边。比起理论写作和批评写作，艺术史写作是一个既快又实惠的工作，毕竟，因为这种艺术史写的都是作者身边的艺术家．被写进的艺术家就会认为这是一本很重要的书而备在身边，而对作者来说．写历史意味着是最有发言权的专家，艺术家就在他的书中被盖棺定论了。中国本来就有重编史而轻理论和批评的传统，所以原本艺术史家是与艺术评论家和艺术理论家各自分工的写作，现在被艺术评论家直接代替．艺术史写作不但不独立而且是不独立的艺术评论家在写艺术史。Contemporary art exhibitions and contemporary art publications in the name of art history have become fashion in these years, which push the contemporary art theory writing and criticism writing aside, and art history writing is a fast and favorable job compared with theory writing and criticism writing. After all, because such art history writing is all about the artists around the author, the artists will think it＇s an important book to take, and for the author, history writing entitles himself to be the expert who has the right to say, and he thus has the powerto evaluate the artists in his book. In China, there is a tradition that emphasizes history writing while despises theoretical and critical writing, so now art critics take the job of art historians and theorists, and it is not only art writing is not independent, but also dependent art critics are writing the art history.

关 键 词：艺术史家 中国当代 写作 方法论 艺术评论家 艺术理论家 艺术家 悼念活动 

分 类 号：J03[艺术—艺术理论]