检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡卫华[1]
出 处:《武汉科技大学学报》2007年第3期327-329,共3页Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology
基 金:武汉科技大学科研基金资助项目(2004xy21)
摘 要:应力场的精确解与近似解之间存在一定的误差。用Muskhelishvili应力函数方法求出I型裂纹应力场的精确解及近似解,不仅从数据上将两种解进行比较,分析两者之间存在的误差,而且分别绘制出两种解随r和a比值变化的曲线图,从而用图形的方法对两者进行比较,最终对近似解的使用范围给出界定。通过比较可知,近似解只适用于表示裂纹尖端附近的应力场。而在工程断裂力学的实际使用中,通常也只考虑裂纹尖端附近的应力场。Certain difference exists between the accurate and the approximate values of stress fields. This paper arrives at the accurate and the approximate values of stress fields of crack Ⅰ with Muskhelishvili stress function, and then analyzes the difference between them. It draws a graph to show the values' change with the ratio of r and a, on the basis of which, it compares the values again and defines the applications of the approximate values. It's held that the approximate values are only suitable for the stress fields near the crack points; and in engineering fracture mechanics, only the stress fields near the crack points need to be taken into account.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30