检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晨[1] 黎湘萍(导师点评)[2]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院研究生院文学系2005级博士研究生 [2]中国社会科学院研究生院文学系
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2007年第3期114-120,共7页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
摘 要:20世纪20年代,以张我军为代表的台湾知识分子抱着文化朝圣的愿望最初进入中国大陆文学界,并将大陆新文学运动之风引向台湾,但台湾文学却由于当时台湾的日治身份而并未被中国新文学作家和中国新文学界所重视。这种现象持续到30年代,台湾文学依旧被当作“外国文学”引介。直到40年代中后期,台湾光复前后,《文艺春秋》的主编范泉始在刊物中集中介绍台湾文学,将台湾文学拉进“中国文学”的视野之中。本文力图梳理这种微秒的变化,并分析产生这种变化背后的社会历史背景。In 1920s, Taiwan scholars represented by Zhang Wojun approached the literary society of China's Mainland with the faith of culture pilgrimage. Although they brought the spirit of New Literature Movement back to Taiwan, Chinese New Literature writers and community didn't take Taiwan native literature seriously because Taiwan was governed by Japan at that time. Therefore Taiwan literature had been regarded as foreign literature in the following decade. Until Taiwan was restored in the late 1940s, Fan Quan, Chief Editor of Wen Yi Chun Qiu, began to intensively introduce Taiwan literature in his journal and thus brought it back into the concept of Chinese literature. This article tries to trace this process and analyze the social and historical background of the change.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15