国内外生化和药理专业博士学位论文质量案例分析  

Case analysis of domestic and overseas doctoral dissertations in biochemistry and pharmacology

作　　者：易凌[1] 吴乐山[1] 赵达生[1] 雷二庆[1] 韩铁[1] 

机构地区：[1]军事医学科学院科技部,北京100850

出　　处：《中华医学科研管理杂志》2007年第3期181-183,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management

摘　　要：目的 了解我国生化和药理专业博士生培养质量现状，发现问题，找出对策，以提高培养质量。方法生化和药理专业各选取2004年博士学位论文10篇，其中国内外各5篇。每专业各聘请5名专家对其相关专业论文独立评议，综合专家对同一篇论文的评价，分别合计专家对同一学科的国内外论文评阅意见。结果两专业国外论文在总体水平上均高于国内。国外论文在科学性和创新性上高于国内，尤其在创新性上差距较大，而逻辑性差别不大。结论我国生化和药理专业博士培养质量喜忧参半，要从加强论文科学性和创新性人手，提倡学科交叉以提高培养质量。To know the status of PhD training quality of our country in biochemistry and pharmacology ; to find the problems which effect on PhD training quality as well as to take measures to pro- mote training quality. Methods： 20 PhD dissertations were selected in biochemistry and pharmacology re-spectively 10, which were half domestic and half overseas. 5 experts were responsible for evaluating every dissertation of related subject independently. Their opinions were collected on the each dissertation. Results of domestic and overseas dissertations in the same subject are summed up respectively. Results： The general level of overseas PhD dissertations in 2 subjects is higher than those of the domestic. Overseas PhD disserta-tions are more scientific and innovative than those of the domestic. There is a great disparity in innovation, whereas little in logicality of dissertations. Conclusion ： Training quality of our biochemical and pharmacolog-ical PhDs is positive, but is not very satisfied. It was suggested that scientific and innovative training for PhD students should be strengthened and disciplinary intercrossing should be advocated in order to improve train-ing quality.

关 键 词：生化和药理专业 博士 论文 学位 案例分析 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生] G643[文化科学—高等教育学]