经学辩论与东汉论说文的变化  

Debates on Study of Confucian Classics and Expository Transformation through East Han Dynasty

作　　者：尚学锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院,北京100875

出　　处：《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第4期34-39,共6页Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：汉代的经学辩论是讲学和著述之外的又一种重要的经学学术活动,它以辨明学术是非和切磋交流、倡导学术为目的。经学辩论有力地冲击了烦琐僵化的章句之学,导致了追求义理明通和崇尚理论著述的风气。受其影响,东汉论说文在形式上多问难之体,在论证方式上形成了实证求真和思辨析理的特色。经学论辩是汉代经学通向魏晋玄学以及汉代散文通向魏晋文章的桥梁。Through analyzing two types of debates on the studies of Confucian classics in the Han Dynasty, this paper points out that the debates strongly challenged the fussy and rigid style of the analysis and interpretation of ancient writings, and led to common practice of pursuing the understanding of meanings and reasons of the texts, and to advocating theoretical writings. The expository texts in the East Han Dynasty mostly took the debating form, and changed from demonstration to analytical reasoning. So the debates of the studies of Confucian classics is a bridge from the studies of Confucian classics in the Han Dynasty to the metaphysics of the Wei and Jin Dynasties, and also as a bridge from the popular prose genre to the expository genre in between.

关 键 词：经学辩论 今古文经学 经学问难 魏晋玄学 东汉论说文 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学]