知性思维的合理性问题  

The Problem of Rationality in Understanding

作　　者：旷三平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所、哲学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《现代哲学》2003年第3期16-21,26,共7页Modern Philosophy

摘　　要：本文认为,知性思维尽管是一种“呆板”的、“教条”的思维范式,可它在人的认识过程中还是有一定的合理性存在的范围和根据的。它同辩证思维一样都是人的生存方式和需要的产物,都是人的创造性思维的表现,都是人的认识过程的环节。因此,不能简单地把知性思维与形而上学的思维方式划上等号。我们既要防止知性思维的不合理越界,即用它来反对、否定,甚至取代辩证思维的意义,也要防止辩证思维的不合理越界,即用它来贬低、消解,甚至取代知性思维的作用。The paper holds that, although the intellectuality thinking is one ＂stereotyped＂, ＂dogmatic＂ thinking mode, it has somewhat reasonable scope and foundation existing in the process of man＇s cognition. It is same as the dialectical thinking that is the production of need and the way of existing of man, the representation of human＇ s creative thinking, the chain of process of man＇s cognition. So, we couldn＇ t simply make the intellectuality thinking equal to the metaphysical thinking mode. We must avoid the intellectuality thinking going unreasonably beyond its limit, that is to say , using it to go against, deny even take place the meaning of the dialectical thinking, and at the same time, we must prevent the dialectical thinking going unreasonably beyond its bound, namely using it to belitde, clear up even take place the role of the intellectuality thinking.

关 键 词：知性思维 辩证思维 合理性 “理性宰制” “越界” 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学]