检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875 [2]湖南科技大学教育系,湖南湘潭411201
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2007年第3期98-102,共5页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(04JZD0026);湖南省教育科学规划"十一五"研究课题(项目编号:XJK06BXL002)
摘 要:采用社会支持评定量表(SSRS)和问题行为问卷对112名初中留守儿童和132名对照组儿童进行测查,探讨初中留守儿童社会支持与问题行为的基本状况以及两者之间的关系。结果发现:(1)初中留守儿童的支持利用度低于对照组儿童,其违法和违纪行为则高于对照组儿童。(2)在社会支持的三个维度中,主观支持对于初中留守儿童的违法、欺骗和违纪行为均具有显著的负向预测作用,支持利用度则对危害健康的行为具有显著的负向预测作用。(3)与较低社会支持水平下的初中留守儿童相比,较高社会支持水平下的留守儿童的四种问题行为相对较少;无论社会支持水平高低,初中留守男生均比留守女生存在更多的危害健康的行为。Social support scale and the problem behaviors questionnaire were used to explore the relationship between social support and problem behaviors of the left-home-kids in junior middle school. The results showed that : (1) On the support utilization, left-home-kids' scores were lower than that of comparison group; on the illegal behavior and deregulation behavior, the result was diverse. (2) As for left-home-kids, Subjective support was the significantly negative predictor for the illegal behavior, deceptive behavior and deregulation behavior. Support utilization was the significantly negative predictor for health-risk behavior. (3) Compared with those who under the situation of lower-level social support, the left-home-kids who under the situation of higher-level social support reported less health-risk behavior, illegal behavior, deceptive behavior and deregulation behavior. Whether the level of social support was lower or higher, left-home-boys reported more health-risk behavior than left-home-girls.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233