检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2007年第8期691-692,共2页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:河南省科技厅2006年资助项目(编号:0624420015)
摘 要:目的评价健康干预对大学生亚健康状态的改善效果,为探讨防治亚健康的方法提供参考依据。方法整群分层抽取郑州市1747名大学生为调查对象,自行设计问卷进行调查。随机抽取处于亚健康状态的大学生100名进行分组,A组为实验组50名,实施健康干预;B组为对照组50名,不采取任何措施。3个月后随访,将B组中无改善者定为C组,即验证组,再进行健康干预,3个月后随访。结果大学生亚健康状态检出率为65.94%,男、女生分别为61.27%,70.39%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。对照组的自然好转率为38.0%,干预组的有效率为96.0%,验证组有效率为93.6%,对照组与干预组、验证组的有效率差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。结论健康干预对处于亚健康状态的人群恢复健康有显著效果。Objective To appraise the effects of intervention measurers to the current students' sub-health condition, and to provide reference for prevention measures to sub-health. Methods A cluster stratified sample of 1 747 undergraduates were investigated by a self-designed questionnaire. 100 students were divided into 2 groups: 50 students who received health intervention were taken as experimental group, anther 50 ones were taken as control. Results The prevalence rate of sub-health was65.94%, which was61.27% for male and 70 . 39 % forfemale(P〈0.01). The effective rate was38.0%, 96.0% and 93.6% in control group, intervention group and validate group respectively( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The health intervention had remarkable effect to sub-healthy undergreduates.
分 类 号:R161.5[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] G479[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30