调解制度中的强制性因素研究  

On the Mandatory Factors in Mediation System

作　　者：史长青[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第4期27-35,共9页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：调解作为一种纠纷解决方式,自诞生之日一直处于合意与强制的紧张关系中。人们对调解制度的诸多期望导致了调解功能的多元化,从而为调解制度带来了强制性契机。对于调解制度中的强制性因素,理论界主要有否定论和限制论两种见解。强制性调解作为一种客观存在,在妥善解决特定纠纷、纯化审判程序、实现效益最大化和避免更大不公平等方面的确有其现实需求。只要处理好与接受裁判权、当事人自治的界限,适当引入强制性因素应当说是现代调解制度的一大趋势。在我国,民间调解和法院调解都需适当引入强制性因素,形成规则之治,但目前却无实行调解前置的必要,应当尝试完善诉讼和解制度。As one manner to resolving disputes, mediation is always in tension between acceptability and compul： sion since it came into the world. The people＇ s lots of expectations to mediation lead to the mediation＇ s multi - functions, and bring the mandatory factors into mediation system. There are two opinions that are negativism and restrictionism to the mandatory factors in mediation system. As impersonal existence, the mandatory mediation does have realistic demand in resolving special disputes, purring trial procedures, realizing the most benefit and avoiding more unjust. If the limits between compulsion and the right access to justice and between compulsion and self - determination are set properly, it should be the trend for modem mediation to bring into mandatory factor. In China, civil mediation and court mediation all need bring mandatory factor to realize rule of law. But now there is not neeessary to found a system of compelling partner attending mediation before litigating, we should try to amend the system of litigation settlement.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 调解制度 强制性因素 ADR程序 强制性调解 接受裁判权 

分 类 号：DF714[政治法律—诉讼法学]