老子“不争”思想之辨析  

Analyses of Laozi's Idea of "Non-contention"

作　　者：董京泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院,北京100806

出　　处：《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第6期10-15,共6页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：在《道德经》中,"不争"共出现8次,与之涵义近似的还有"知足"、"知止"、"不敢为天下先"、"无为"等,它们亦频频出现于《道德经》中。老子所说的"不争",并没有反对斗争,特别是反对为了推进生产发展和社会进步而进行的生产斗争、阶级斗争、思想斗争、社会政治斗争等的涵义;把老子的"不争"说成是反对斗争,特别是"站在没落奴隶主立场上",反对人民群众反抗压迫者和剥削者的斗争,是对老子思想的严重误解。In ＂Tao Te Ching＂, the term of ＂non-contention＂ appears eight times, together with such terms of similar connotations as ＂complacence＂, ＂limit awareness＂, ＂refraining from being the first under the sun＂, ＂inaction＂, etc., which are also frequently found in ＂Tao Te Ching＂. By ＂non-contention＂, Laozi did not mean to be against fighting, especially fighting in terms of production endeavor, class struggle, ideological dispute, social and political aspiration, etc. , for the sake of boosting productivity and promoting social progress. It is a serious error to interpret Laozi＇ s ＂non-contention＂ as anti-class struggle, especially as anti-class struggle against oppressors and exploiter ＂on the stand of declining slave owners＂.

关 键 词：老子 不争 道德经 

分 类 号：B223.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]