检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学教育科学学院心理健康研究所,浙江杭州310036
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2007年第6期606-608,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的:探讨中韩两国大学生的父母养育方式、自我效能及两者相关程度的差异。方法:以282名中韩大学生作为研究对象,选择父母养育方式量表(EMBU)、一般自我效能量表(GSES)为评定工具。结果:①中韩大学生在父母亲情感温暖和理解、父母亲偏爱、父亲拒绝与否认上存在显著差异。②中韩大学生自我效能没有显著差异。③在两国,父、母情感温暖与理解与大学生自我效能均呈显著正相关;父亲拒绝与否认、父亲惩罚与严厉均与大学生自我效能呈显著负相关。在中国,母亲偏爱、父亲的过度保护与大学生自我效能呈显著正相关,父亲偏爱、母亲惩罚与严厉与大学生自我效能呈显著负相关;而在韩国则是父亲过度保护与大学生自我效能呈显著负相关。④中韩两国父亲过度保护与大学生自我效能的相关程度存在显著差异。结论:中韩大学生在父母养育方式及其与自我效能的相关程度上存在一定差异,但均提示父母养育方式与大学生自我效能显著相关。Objective: To explore relationship between parental rearing styles and serf-efficacy. To compare the differences of parental rearing styles, self-efficacy between China and Korea. Methods: Two hundred and eighty-four undergraduate students were surveyed by GSES and EMBU. Results:①There were significant differences in scores of parental emotional warmth,parental favorite,father's refusal and denial between Chinese students and Korean students. ②The mean score of self-efficacy had no significant differences between Chinese students and Korean students. ③There were some similarities and differences in the relation of parental rearing styles and self-efficacy between Chinese students and Korean students. ④The correlation levels on parental rearing style and self-efficacy were significantly different between Chinese students and Korean students. Conclusion: Chinese and Korean undergraduate students have certain differences between parental rearing styles and seff-efficacy, but both suggust that parental rearing styles are related to seff-efficacy. To improve parental rearing styles could help to improve undergraduate students' self-efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.247.39