检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李中权[1] 孙晓敏[1] 张厚粲[1] 张立松[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学
出 处:《中国考试》2008年第1期26-31,共6页journal of China Examinations
摘 要:主观题的评分受到很多因素的影响,如评分者的知识水平、综合能力和个人偏好等。这些评分者偏差不仅会导致不同评分者之M存在主观差异,也会到导致同一评分者在不同的时间也具有主观不稳定性。最终导致主观题评分信度的降低。本研究将多面Rasch模型运用到某国家级考试论述题的评分培训中。通过分析6名有经验评分者对58份试卷的试评数据,鉴别出四种评分者偏差,然后据此对每个评分者进行个别反馈,从而提高评分的客观性和精确性。Rating of Subjective items may be influenced by many factors, such as knowledge, ability and preference of raters. They result in not only inter-rater inconsistence, but also intra-rater instability, both of which harm to the rating reliability for subjective items. In the presents study, many-facet Rasch model was applied in rater training program for a national examination. Four types of rater biases were identified through data analysis of 6 raters on an essay item for 58 examinees. Then raters were received individual feedbacks on rating behavior to improve rating objectivity and accuracy.
分 类 号:G405[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.251