检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王斐弘[1]
出 处:《中国律师和法学家》2008年第1期1-9,14,共10页Journal of China Lawyer and Jurist
摘 要:寻找惩罚犯罪与保障人权之间的平衡点,既是刑事诉讼理论永恒的主题,也是世界各国司法实践的难题。而二者并重还是有所侧重,不仅是一个事关刑事诉讼理念并由此决定一国刑事诉讼法的模式、原则以及具体制度建构的核心问题,在中国,还是一个能否革除刑诉积弊、实现宪法修正案保障人权的大问题。在中国热研刑事诉讼法再修改之际,这更是再修改的刑诉法生或死的关隘问题。我们应当放弃固守多年的并重论,倡导“侧重论”,即侧重保障人权。Finding the balancing point between punishing crimes and protecting human rights, is not only the permanent main topic of the criminal procedure theory, but also the difficulty of the juridical practice all over the world. Partial emphasis or balance emphasis between the punishment and protection, is not only a core problem concerning criminal procedure concept, which decided the mode, principle, and specific system construction of the criminal procedure law in one country, but also a big problem concerning abolishing the deep-rooted evils in criminal procedure and practicing the protection of human rights gifted by constitution amendment in China. When the modifying criminal procedure law is becoming a hot topic in China, it is a key problem concerning the live or death of the modified criminal procedure law. We should give up the balancing emphasis theory which is sticking for many years, instead, advocate the “partial emphasis theory”--partial emphasis on protecting human rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.114