检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨素芳[1] 陈玉[1] 胡晓静[2] 冯贵雪[3] 潘红平[2] 石德顺[1]
机构地区:[1]广西大学动物繁殖研究所,南宁530005 [2]广西大学动物科学技术学院,南宁530005 [3]广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院生殖中心,南宁530003
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2008年第3期257-261,共5页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家"863"计划资助项目(2005AA206130);广西青年科学基金资助项目(0542022)
摘 要:为建立玻璃化冷冻保存水牛MⅡ期卵母细胞的有效程序,试验比较了3种冷冻保护剂组合(Ⅰ:20%乙二醇+20%二甲基亚砜;Ⅱ:25%乙二醇+25%二甲基亚砜;III:25%乙二醇+25%甘油)和3种玻璃化冷冻方法(毛细玻璃管法、铜环法及半麦管法)对水牛MⅡ期卵母细胞的毒性和冷冻效果的影响。结果表明,Ⅲ组的卵母细胞形态正常率显著低于Ⅰ和Ⅱ组(P<0.05),且III组的存活率也显著低于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),而Ⅰ和Ⅱ组的卵母细胞形态正常率和存活率没有显著差异(P>0.05)。进一步孤雌激活发现,Ⅰ组的卵裂率显著高于Ⅲ组(29.17±4.81%,5.56±11.11%,P<0.05),Ⅰ组的囊胚发育率显著高于Ⅱ和Ⅲ组(8.33±2.23%,2.43±2.87%,1.86±3.71%,P<0.05),然而Ⅱ和Ⅲ组间的卵裂率和囊胚发育率没有差别(P>0.05)。采用铜环法的回收率显著高于半麦管法(P<0.05),但和毛细玻璃管法之间差异不显著(P>0.05),冻后卵母细胞孤雌激活后的卵裂率和囊胚发育率差异不显著(P>0.05)。3种冷冻保护剂中Ⅰ组的细胞毒性作用最小,Ⅲ组的细胞毒性作用最大;铜环法和毛细玻璃管法能有效冷冻保存水牛的MⅡ期卵母细胞。To establish an effective vitrification of Metaphase Ⅱ (MⅡ) buffalo oocytes,the experiments was performed to compare the toxicity of three combinations of cryoprotectants (I:20% ethylene glycol (EG)+20% dimethyl sulfoxide(DMSO); Ⅱ:25% EG+25% DMSO;Ⅲ:EG 25%+25% glycerol (GL) employed MⅡ buffalo oocytes. A further study was taken to compare the cryopreservation effects of glass micropipette vitrification (GMP), cryoloop vitrification (CLV) and hemistraw method. The results showed that the morphological normal rate of group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ were significantly lower than that of group Ⅲ(P〈0.05), and the survival rate of group Ⅲ was lower than that of group Ⅰ(P〈0.05), but the morphological normal rate and survival rate between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ had no significantly difference (P〉0.05). By means of parthenogenetieall activation, the cleavage rate of group I was higher than that of group Ⅲ(29.17±4.81% vs 5.56±11.11%,P〈0.05), and blastocyst development rate of group I was also significantly higher than that of group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ(8.33±2.23% vs 2.43±2.87,1.86±3.71%, P〈0.05), but the both rates were not significantly different between group I and group Ⅱ (P〉0.05). The reclaimed rate of CLV method was significantly higher than that of hemistraw method (P〈0.05), but there were no significance difference between the GMP and hemistraw (P〉0.05). The cleavage and blastocyst rate among GMP, CLV and hemistraw were not significantly different(P〉0.05) .In conclusion, the toxicity of I group I was the smallest and the group Ⅲthe biggest. MⅡ buffalo oocytes could be vitrified effectively by CLV and GMP methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229