检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第2期132-137,共6页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部港澳台事务办公室资助项目"台湾高等教育评鉴的研究"阶段成果
摘 要:教育质量的评价与审查,大陆称为评估,台湾称为评鉴。无论评估还是评鉴,都应为社会公众提供关于教育水平和质量的公正、客观、科学、可靠的信息。然而,近年高校评估价值出现了异化的现象[1],一些学者质疑高等教育评估质量[2,3],值得关注。文章在此背景下介绍和分析了与大陆文化背景相同、思维逻辑相似的台湾高等教育评鉴的发展和演进,以供参考。文章认为,台湾高等教育评鉴纳入法制化轨道、中介机构的建立和运作、评鉴的指标体系、评鉴工作的国际化视野等都值得借鉴。The evaluation of educational quality should provide all the societal stakeholders the unbiased, objective, scientific and reliable information. Nevertheless, there appeared a trend of the value alienation in the evaluation of higher learning institutions, some scholars questioned the evaluation quality of higher education itself, and this should be drawn public attention. The author makes analysis on the introduction and progress of the evaluation of higher education in Taiwan, China, which is stamped with the similar cultural background and thinking logic with China mainlanders; hopefully, this can be of reference to individuals concerned. The author argues that ideas can be drawn from Taiwan' s experiences in the legalization of higher education evaluation, the establishment and operation of the professional agencies, the evaluation norm systems, and the vision of internationalization.
分 类 号:G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28