从来前贤畏后生——重评章学诚对戴震的批评  

Former Worthies Would Be Regarded a Youth with Respect—Reevaluation of Zhang Xuecheng's(章学诚) Criticism of Dai Zhen(戴震)

作　　者：吴根友[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国传统文化研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第2期20-27,共8页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(05JJD770016)

摘　　要：章学诚对戴震的批评可以从三个方面看,一是章学诚在伦理观方面持比较保守的态度,无法理解戴震对程朱学术的批评;二是章学诚在历史哲学方面持动态的发展观,从道的历时性角度揭示了道的开放性,从这一角度出发,批评戴震的"道在六经"的观点,有其学术的合理性;三是章学诚在地方志编纂方面批评戴震的地方志思想。因为二人的地方志观念不同,各有所是,故对此应作具体分析。This essay claims that Zhang Xuecheng＇s criticism of Dai Zhen can be understood from the following three aspects： first, as Zhang holds a relatively conservative attitude in ethics, he cannot really understand Dai Zhen＇s academic criticism of Cheng-Zhu Confucian thoughts ; secondly, Zhang holds a dynamic view on the development of historical philosophy, and he explores Tao＇s feature of openness from a diachronic angle. Seen from this perspective Zhang＇s criticism of Dai Zhen＇s view that ＂Tao exists in the Six Arts＂ has its rationality. Thirdly, his criticism of Dai Zhen＇s ideas in compiling local chronicles implies both reasonable and unreasonable aspects. This is because they hold different ideas in the compilation of local chronicles. Both of them have their reasonable aspects, which should be analyzed specifically.

关 键 词：章学诚 戴震 伦理观 道论 地方志 

分 类 号：B249.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]