论构建独立的期货犯罪罪名体系  

On the Independent Accusations System of Futures Crimes

作　　者：曹廷生[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第4期84-87,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：我国《刑法》对"直接性期货犯罪"罪名的设置,采取了与证券犯罪合并规定的方式,即在相应条文"证券"二字后面加上"期货"二字。学者大多批评这种做法,主张应将期货犯罪罪名从证券犯罪中分离出来。实际上,作为金融犯罪的两种特殊形态,二者在罪名上的"分"与"合"只是立法技术问题,构建独立的期货犯罪罪名体系才是问题的关键。The accusations of direct futures crimes are provided together with those of securities crimes in the Criminal Law. That＇ s to say, in the Criminal Law, all the futures crimes are prescribed by means of adding the word of futures after that of securities. Most of scholars take a critical attitude toward this and argue that futures crimes should be detached from securities crimes. Factually, whether the two accusations are provided separately or not is only a matter of legislative technicality. How to constitute an independent accusation system of futures crimes is the key point.

关 键 词：期货犯罪 证券犯罪 罪名体系 

分 类 号：DF623[政治法律—刑法学]