检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学宇航科学技术学院,北京100081
出 处:《弹箭与制导学报》2008年第3期175-180,共6页Journal of Projectiles,Rockets,Missiles and Guidance
基 金:国防基础科研基金资助
摘 要:为了确定最适合于火箭弹气动学科的近似方法,分别采用二阶响应面方法、Kriging方法、径向基神经网络方法构建了火箭弹气动学科代理模型,并对三种代理模型的近似精度做了比较。针对现有近似方法评估策略的不足,提出了一种基于相对误差综合均值的近似效果综合评估策略。结果表明该评估策略是有效的,二阶响应面近似方法不可取,径向基神经网络近似方法部分点数据的近似精度低于Kriging方法,但其综合性能最好。The applicability of different aerodynamic sub-discipline approximation method of rocket aerodynamic sub-discipline surrogate model establishment was studied. The rocket aerodynamic Sub-discipline surrogate models were established by means of square response surface method, Kriging method and RBF neural network respectively, and the accuracy of each surrogate model was compared. An integrative evaluating strategy based on the comprehensive mean value of the relative error was introduced to consummate the existing evaluating strategies. Subsequently, the precision of three approximation method was evaluated. The result shows that this evaluating method is effective, 2nd order response surface method is not advisable, and through several results of RBF NN are worse than Kriging method in some points, its comprehensive performance is the best.
分 类 号:TJ415[兵器科学与技术—火炮、自动武器与弹药工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104