检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈思远[1] 管阳阳[1] 张伟[1] 李建伟[2]
机构地区:[1]中国.山东省曲阜师范大学教育科学学院,273165 [2]曲阜师范大学心理科学研究中心
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2008年第7期823-825,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的测试Hwitt多维完美主义量表在中国大学生中的信度和效度,并对其进行修订。方法对650名大学生进行了测试,采用探索性和验证性因素分析对问卷的因素进行检验,计算量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度等。结果量表最后保留17个项目.可解释总方差的46.70%,各维度的项目栽荷在0.41~0,78之间。验证性因素分析指标χ^2、RMSEA、NFI、CFI、GFI分别为1045.259、0,066、0.900、0.896、0.920。总量表与分量表的α系数和重测信度都在0.68以上。结论修订后的HMPS具有较理想的信效度,较适合中国大学生使用。Objective To test the reliability and validity of Hewitt Multi-dimensional Perfectionism Scale for Chinese college students, and revise it. Methods 650 college students were tested, and then the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the data, at last the a coefficients, 1 month interval test-retest reliabilities and other factors were computed. Results The revised Perfectionism Scale consisted of 17 items, and explained 46.70% of the variance with loading between 0. 41~0.78. All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including χ^2 RMSEA, NFI, CFI, GFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The a coefficients of the scale and sub-scales and test-retest reliabilities were over 0. 68. Conclusion The revised native Perfectionism Scale for Chinese college students has better satisfying validities and reliabilities and is more suitable for use among the native college students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3