关于《现代》的“第三种人”论争及施蛰存的倾向性  

The "Men of the Third Category" Argument in Modernity and Shi Zhecun's Attitude

作　　者：杨迎平[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北师范学院中文系,湖北黄石435002

出　　处：《荆门职业技术学院学报》2008年第8期23-27,共5页Journal of Jingmen Technical College

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基金项目"施蛰存研究"(项目批准号:07JA751037)的研究成果

摘　　要：苏汶(杜衡)在《现代》一卷三期发表了《关于"文新"与胡秋原的文艺论辩》,从而引发了20世纪30年代的"第三种人"论争。因为施蛰存是《现代》杂志的编辑,所以施蛰存也被鲁迅和左翼作家称为"第三种人",虽然施蛰存说他在《现代》编辑这场论争的文章时,"始终缄默无言。"但我以为,施蛰存自始至终有他的倾向性。The argument about ＂Men of the Third Category＂ originated from an essay by Su Wen＇s On New Essays and Hu Qiuyuan＇s Literary and Art Thoughts published on the third issue the first volume magazine Modernity. As an editor of the magazine, Shi is also termed as one of ＂Men of the Third Category＂ by Lu Xun and other left - wing writers of the time. Though remained lip - sealed, Shi, according the author, is actually speaking for himself.

关 键 词：施蛰存 《现代》 “第三种人” 倾向性 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]