鲍德里亚与早期法兰克福学派思想的比较研究  

Comparative Study on Baudrillard's and Early Frankfort School's Thinking

作　　者：孔明安[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心博士后

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2008年第5期52-56,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基　　金：复旦大学国外马克思主义与国外思潮研究创新基地“后现代主义与马克思主义”项目成果,项目批准号:05FCZD008;上海市重点学科建设项目资助,项目编号:B103

摘　　要：鲍德里亚与法兰克福学派之间的内在逻辑关联以及他们之间的异同,具体表现为:其一,二者都看到了符号在现代技术社会批判中的重要性。其二,二者都是在悲观的技术决定论的前提下展开了资本主义社会对人的个性的压抑的批判;其三,二者的批判都具有浓重的乌托邦色彩;其四,鲍德里亚后来抛弃他早期的消费社会批判理论,转而寻求一种更加激进的技术批判理论,因此,从深度和广度而言,鲍德里亚的批判远远地超过早期法兰克福学派。This paper concludes the differences and similarities between the two as follows： Firstly, they both have found the importance of signs in the critique of modern technological society; Secondly, they both began to criticize capitalism for its suppressing human person- ality under modern technological society~ Thirdly, their criticism both had the strong ele- ments of Utopia} Fourthly, Baudrillard later abandoned his early critical theory of the con- sumption society, instead seeking a more radical technology critical theory. Therefore, both in terms of the depth and breadth, the criticism of Baudrillard is far more than that of early Frankfurt school.

关 键 词：文化工业 消费社会 符号消费 异化 透明的恶 

分 类 号：B516.59[哲学宗教—外国哲学]