中国明代战略文化与儒家文化的一致性研究--与江忆恩商榷  

The Consistency Of Strategic Culture with Confucian Culture In China's Ming Dynasty:A Response to Professor Alastair Iain Johnstons

作　　者：李晓燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院,北京102249

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2008年第10期66-76,共11页World Economics and Politics

摘　　要：作为对江忆恩战略文化研究的回应,作者在对中国明代战略文化与儒家文化的一致性问题进行重新验证后认为,明代战略文化是否反映中国儒家文化取决于明代决策者对儒家文化的内化程度。具体验证环节有三个步骤:第一步确定儒家文化的战略倾向;第二步检验明代决策者对儒家文化的内化程度;第三步考察明代决策者的战略文化倾向。虽然作者同江忆恩一样主要使用了文献分析的研究方法,但是其研究结果却表明,中国明代的决策者不仅高度内化了儒家文化,并且表现出与儒家文化一致的战略倾向。这个研究发现说明江忆恩在对中国明代战略文化的定性中,从片面的文献选择和分析中得出一般性结论是一个严重的逻辑错误。As a response to professor Alastair Iain Johnston's strategic culture study,this article testifies the consistency of strategic culture with Confucian Culture in China's Ming Dynasty,and draws the conclusion that the consistency relies upon the Ming Dynasty decision-makers' internalization of Confucian Culture.There are three steps to testify this conclusion:firstly,to identify Confucian Culture's strategic preferences;secondly,to examine the Ming Dynasty decision-makers' internalization degree of Confucian Culture;thirdly,to identify their strategic culture preferences.Nevertheless,using the same research method of textual analysis as Professor Johnston,the author finds that the Ming Dynasty decision-makers had internalized Confucian Culture deeply and shown consistent strategic preferences for Confucian Culture.The findings demonstrate that Professor Johnston made a serious logic mistake as he judged the nature of strategic culture in China's Ming Dynasty in that he drew a general conclusion with unilateral textual analysis.

关 键 词：战略文化 儒家文化 内化 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学] K248[历史地理—历史学]