对一元训练理论部分论据的质疑  

Queries about arguments for the theory of monistic training

作　　者：张春合[1] 余学好[1] 张中林[1] 

机构地区：[1]怀化学院体育系,湖南怀化418008

出　　处：《体育学刊》2008年第10期89-91,共3页Journal of Physical Education

摘　　要：对一元训练理论论据中足球运动员、长跑运动员的耐力问题和链球运动员的力量素质问题的分析和论证发现,一元训练理论对此现象的解释存在着明显的误解、曲解,甚至断章取义、以偏概全,揭示该理论运用列举"事实"和"平移"科学的方法来引申结论,论据只限于形象的描述所提出的假设,并不具备结论意义上的支撑作用,也没有继承传统合理的东西。The authors analyzed and demonstrated such issues in the theory of monistic training as football player＇s stamina, long-distance runner＇s stamina, and hammer throw athlete＇s power capacity, found that in the explanation for this phenomenon by the theory of monistic training, there are obvious misunderstanding, wrong interpretation, and even garbled quotation and fallacy of composition, and revealed that the theory drew its conclusions by means of listing ＂facts＂ and ＂translating＂ science, and that its arguments were limited to superficially describing hypotheses put forward, but neither supported its conclusions, nor inherited any traditionally rational things.

关 键 词：运动训练学 一元训练理论 足球 长跑 链球 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]