检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学空管学院,天津300300 [2]南京航空航天大学民航学院,江苏南京210016
出 处:《航空学报》2008年第6期1411-1418,共8页Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(60572165);国家"863"计划
摘 要:首先概述了飞行间隔安全评估研究中常用的概念,然后从REICH模型、交叉航路模型、概率论模型、随机分析模型、EVENT模型和RASRAM模型6种常用碰撞风险模型的角度,分析了各个模型的优缺点和各自的适用范围,分析结果表明飞行间隔安全评估中的关键问题为:模型的限制、管制意图和安全评价,并在此基础上分析了飞行间隔安全评估未来的研究方向。The main concepts of flight separation safety assessment are present: flight separation, separation minima, conflict, airmiss, and collision. Then the flight separation safety assessments are addressed in detail from six main models: REICH model, intersecting rout model, probability model, stochastic analysis model, EVENT model and RASRAM model, and then the application scope, merits and drawbacks of each model are analyzed. The results show that the main key problems of safety assessment of flight separation are the conditional limit of the model, the reasonable intent and safety evaluation. Furthermore the tendencies of the research in the future are put forward: the flight separation safety assessment based on communication, navigation, surveillance (CNS) performance, the avoidance system how to reduce the collision risk, and human factors how to influence the collision risk.
分 类 号:V355.1[航空宇航科学与技术—人机与环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15