检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学教育学院心理学系 [2]苏州大学应用心理学研究所
出 处:《社会心理科学》2008年第6期29-30,77,共3页Science of Social Psychology
摘 要:在目前关于"控制感"的研究中,概念界定一直是困扰许多研究者的问题。研究从控制源、自我效能感两个概念出发,阐述控制感概念与两者之间存在区别,包含更多的内容,提出控制感概念界定可以从方向和强度上予以考虑,并将控制感定义为:个体相信自己能够影响事件地进行而获得所期望结果的程度,而且这种影响是由个体自己而非外界的因素来决定的。概念的清晰界定对于今后控制感的测量和理论发展有着较大的益处。At present, in the studies about the sense of control, concept definition is a big problem which made many researchers puzzled. This article discuss the differenses of the definitions of the sense of control, the locus of control and the perceived self-efficacy. It recommend that there are more intensions existed in the sense of control. Evidently direction and intensity should be considered when concept definited. The sense of control is definited that it is the extent that people believe himself to affect the process of affair and accept the result which he wishes, and the affection is made by himself but not external. A clear difinition will certainly be beneficial to the scale and theory of the sense of control.
分 类 号:G442[哲学宗教—心理学] G451[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74