检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第6期579-581,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:全国哲学社会科学"十五"规划课题(BBA030015);云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(03Z390G)
摘 要:目的:探讨中国罪犯与美国罪犯思维风格的差异。方法:采用PICTS为测量工具对79名男性罪犯的思维风格进行测试。结果:两组罪犯在安慰型和自我消除型分量表上无显著差异,在权利型、超乐观型思维倾向上,国内罪犯显著低于美国罪犯,而在能力取向型、感伤型、认知懒散型和中断型四纬度上均显著高于美国罪犯。结论:由于文化背景的差异性,国内外罪犯在犯罪思维风格的各维度上有不同的表现。Objective: To compare Chinese and American Criminal’s thinking styles. Methods: 79 male criminal’ were tested with CPI. Results: The comparison presented there were no difference between two criminal groups in the Mollification scale and the Cutoff scale. Chinese criminals were lower than American Criminals in the Power Orientation and the Super-optimism scale. However, they had higher scores than American Criminals in the Entitlement scale, Sentimentality scale, Cognitive Indolence scale and the Discontinuity scale. Conclusion: Because of the different culture influ- ence, there is much difference on the thinking styles of criminals between two countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63