刑事再审事由中的“新证据”、“证据虚假”和“证据不足”  

"New Evidence","False Evidence" and "Insufficient Evidence" as Reasons for Criminal Retrial

作　　者：黄士元[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,济南250100

出　　处：《证据科学》2008年第6期676-688,共13页Evidence Science

摘　　要：刑事再审理由的设定,关涉到"法的安定性"和"法的公平性"的平衡,是刑事再审制度的核心问题之一。提起的再审是有利于还是不利于被判决人对"新证据"的崭新性、显著性,对"证据虚假"的形式要件、实质要件等都有着直接的影响。我国不应该将"证据不足"这种涉及证据证明力的事由作为再审事由。The reason for criminal retrial, which is relevant to the balance between stability of law and fairness of law, is one of the core questions in the system of criminal retrial. Whether the retrial is favorable or unfavorable to the defendant has direct influence on the newness and notability of ＂new evidence＂ and the formal and essential elements of ＂false evidence＂. ＂Insufficient evidence＂ should not be a reason for criminal retrial.

关 键 词：刑事再审事由 新证据 证据虚假 证据不足 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]