从康德的“启蒙论文”重新反思“启蒙的辩证法”  

Reflections on the "Dialectics in Enlightenment":A Review of Kant's "An Answer to the Question:What is Enlightenment"

作　　者：邓安庆[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院 [2]教育部国外马克思主义和国外思潮创新基地

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2009年第2期5-10,共6页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(04BZX052)

摘　　要：由于"启蒙"伴随着现代化的整个过程,对"现代性"的批判实质上就是对"启蒙"的批判。说"启蒙"存在着"辩证法",并非什么深刻的思想。若要深入地思考"启蒙辩证法"这一"现象",关键的就不是简单地从"启蒙"宣导者的立场跳跃到"启蒙"反对者的立场上,而在于如何"超越""启蒙"内在的局限,因为"辩证法"作为一种"思想方式"从根本上就是反对"非此即彼"的外在否定。而要完成对启蒙的"内在超越",我们的思想必须返回到"启蒙的经典作家"的经典论述。The symbiosis between the “enlightenment” and the whole process of modernization makes the criticism of the “modernity” become the criticism of the “enlightenment”. There is no nontrivial originality in the thought that the “enlightenment” is a dialectical process. The key to making an in-depth observation of the “phenomenon” of “the enlightenment entailing the dialectics” is how to rise above the intrinsic limitations of the “enlightenment” rather than to make a U turn from advocating the “enlightenment” to opposing it, for as a mode of thinking the “dialectics” is totally against the external negation characterized by making a simple choice between the two extremes of “good” or “bad”. The achievement of an “internal solution” to the limitations entailed in the enlightenment, however, requires our recourse to the formulations presented by “the authors of the enlightenment classics”.

关 键 词：康德 启蒙 理性 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]