对非法取得被告人供述的排除规则的法律思考  

The Legal Consideration of Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Confession

作　　者：邢娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学法学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010021

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第2期47-51,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：非法行为取得的被告人供述的证据能力如何确定,是我国刑事诉讼证据立法及理论研究的空白。构建我国的非法证据排除规则的核心问题在于通过何种程序确定非法取得的被告人供述的证据能力。在判断非法供述的证据能力过程中,应当赋予司法裁判者自由裁量权,结合案情具体判断,在"有效打击犯罪"与"保障被告人人权"两种价值之间进行平衡。How to determine the confessional evidences which are obtained by illegal action is still an legislative vacancy in the criminal procedure law in China . The key problem on how to set the exclusionary rule of confession illegally obtained in China is the procedure of determining the credibility. In the course of estimating whether the evidences are obtained by legal way, the judges should have discretion, and then they could get balance between ＂attacking the crimes effectively＂ and ＂protecting the defendants＂ human rights＂.

关 键 词：非法 被告人供述 排除 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]