二维语义学如何重建“金三角”?  

Can Two-dimensional Semantics Rebuild the Golden Triangle?

作　　者：任会明[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学语言与认知研究中心

出　　处：《哲学研究》2009年第3期92-102,共11页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：I argue that two-dimensional semantics cannot rebuild the golden triangle broken by Kripke’s criticism on the traditional semantics.This is because,on the one hand,in the notion of scrutability,Fregean sense is presupposed implicitly;and on the other,considering a possibility as actual cannot guarantee that the notion of meaning so erected is anything like that of Fregean sense.If Fregean sense has to be presupposed in the notion of scrutability,Kripke’s criticism will remain effective.If the notion of meaning so erected is not like that of Fregean sense,then Fregean link,one lateral of the goldean triangle,will be lost.I argue that two-dimensional semantics cannot rebuild the golden triangle broken by Kripke's criticism on the traditional semantics.This is because,on the one hand,in the notion of scrutability,Fregean sense is presupposed implicitly;and on the other,considering a possibility as actual cannot guarantee that the notion of meaning so erected is anything like that of Fregean sense.If Fregean sense has to be presupposed in the notion of scrutability,Kripke's criticism will remain effective.If the notion of meaning so erected is not like that of Fregean sense,then Fregean link,one lateral of the goldean triangle,will be lost.

关 键 词：语义学 “金三角” 二维 心智哲学 批判 成熟 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学] H313[语言文字—英语]