检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]暨南大学管理学院,广州510632 [2]上海财经大学国际工商管理学院,上海200433
出 处:《商业经济与管理》2009年第5期81-89,共9页Journal of Business Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70872069);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JA630032);广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(06JDXM63005);暨南大学"211工程"三期建设项目"服务运营与品牌管理"
摘 要:自有品牌的客观质量与全国性品牌相差较小,但是感知质量相差较大,自有品牌的感知质量较低。自有品牌的学者们对此困惑不解,他们常常认为原因在于自有品牌的价格和包装档次较低等。文章从线索诊断理论的角度对此进行研究,认为自有品牌比全国性品牌感知质量低的根本原因并不是价格低和包装档次低,而在于自有品牌的品牌积累比全国性品牌低。在品牌积累上全国性品牌最高,自有品牌次之,不知名制造商品牌最低。这三种品牌的外部直观线索的诊断性也逐渐降低,自有品牌的感知质量居于不知名制造商品牌和全国性品牌的中间。与全国性品牌相比,自有品牌的品牌积累较低是自有品牌质量提高中的瓶颈问题。Store brands' objective quality is high, but perceived quality is low compared to national brands. Scholars in the store brands area are puzzled about this. They often believe that the reason is that store brands' price and levels of package are both low. This paper studies this problem by cue diagnosis framework. This paper argues that the reason that store brands perceived quality is lower than national brands is not store brand's low price or low level of package, and the fundamental reason is the lower level of store brand's accumulative brand than national brands. For the level of accumulative brand, national brands are highest, store brands lie in the middle, and the unknown manufacturing brands are lowest. The diagnosis of extrinsic intuitive cue of these three kinds of brands decreases gradually. Therefore, store brands' perceived quality lies in the middle. Compared to national brands, low level of brand accumulation is the bottle-neck problem in struggling to improve store brands' perceived quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.189.231