检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张守一[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732
出 处:《当代财经》2009年第6期5-8,共4页Contemporary Finance and Economics
摘 要:在西方经济学中,各学派之间的激烈争论——经济学"拳击赛"从未停过。面对当前全球性金融危机,需要安排凯恩斯与弗里德曼进行一场"拳击赛"。通过分析他们有关政府要不要干预经济、政府干预经济的工具、政府怎样干预经济、政府干预经济的效果等方面的政策主张,结果发现:在这场经济学"拳击赛"中,凯派获胜,弗派失利。因此,为了对付金融危机,包括中国在内的各国政府纷纷出台了较大力度的措施,使凯派在西方经济学中的主导地位重新得到了确立。In Westem economics, all the heated debates between the schools "boxing matches" in economics have never ceased. Faced with the current global financial crisis, it is necessary to arrange a "boxing match" between Keynes and Friedman. Through the analysis of their ideas about government policies, such as whether to interfere with the economy, the tool used by the government to interfere with the economy, how to interfere with the economy, the effects of government intervention in the economy and so on, it is found that in that "boxing match" in economics, the winning side is Keynes and the losing side is Friedman. Therefore, in order to deal with the financial crisis, the governments of every country, including China, have one by one introduced measures with greater intensity to re-establish the dominant position of Keynesianism in the Western economics.
关 键 词:西方经济学 “拳击赛” 凯恩斯 弗里德曼 政府干预经济
分 类 号:F015[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.240.192