D-N认知评估系统在AD／HD儿童认知评估中的应用  

A Research on the Application of D-N: Cognitive Assessment System In the Cognitive Evaluation of the AD/HD Children

作　　者：邓赐平[1] 傅丽萍[2] 李其维[1] Jagannath P.Das 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062 [2]贵州师范大学教科院,贵州550001 [3]University of Alberta,Edmonton,Canada

出　　处：《心理发展与教育》2009年第3期77-82,共6页Psychological Development and Education

基　　金：研究得到国家自然科学基金项目(编号:30470581);上海市教育科学研究重点项目(编号:A0820)的资助

摘　　要：研究采用基于PASS理论建构的D-N认知评估系统(CAS)作为主要评估工具,以临床推介的18名AD/HD儿童和18名在性别、年龄及智力水平与临床样本相匹配的正常儿童为被试,对其PASS认知过程特征开展比较研究,探查临床组儿童潜在的认知过程异常,研究结果表明:(1)临床AD/HD儿童在CAS总量表分上显著低于正常对照组儿童;(2)临床AD/HD儿童与正常对照组儿童在计划和注意过程分数上存在显著差异,且临床AD/HD儿童的计划和注意分量表分数可很好地预测其在DSM-IV上的注意涣散评估分数;(3)临床AD/HD组儿童与正常对照组儿童在同时性加工和继时性加工水平上则没有显著差异。In the study, two groups of children were recruited as Participants. The clinical group consisted of 18 children with AD/HD from Shanghai Mental Health Center, and the other group included 18 normal children selected from a primary school, who matched those children with AD/HD one-by-one by age, gender, and score on Raven＇s Progressive Matrices. Two groups of children＇s scores on Das-Naglieri： Cognitive Assessment System （CAS）, developed on the PASS model, were collected and analyzed. The results showed that two groups of children scored differently on Attention Scale and Planning Scale of CAS, and children with AD/HD got lower scores at these two scales than that of normal children. However, two groups of children showed no difference in their performance in Simultaneous Processing Scale and Successive Processing Scale. A further analysis also showed that AD/HD children＇ s scores on the Attention Scale and Planning Scale predicted well their performance of inattention assessed according to DSM-IV criteria. Thus, the findings suggested that, if used properly, CAS would be helpful for assessing and diagnosing AD/HD children.

关 键 词：注意缺陷/多动障碍(AD/HD) PASS理论 D-N认知评估系统(CAS) 注意 计划 

分 类 号：B848.5[哲学宗教—心理学] G610[文化科学—学前教育学]