“可说”、“不可说”与语言非工具性  

"Sayable","Unsaybale" and Language Non-instrumental Features

作　　者：尹铁超[1,2] 马亮[2] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学世界文明史研究中心,长春130024 [2]黑龙江大学西语学院,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第4期120-124,共5页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究2007年度规划基金项目(07JA720007)

摘　　要：思维的维度分为两种:语言维度和非语言维度。这两个维度都可以通过表达方式在人际间进行沟通。语言维度通过语言符号来表达,非语言维度通过非语言符号来表达。语言符号的表达称为"可说",非语言符号的表达称为"不可说"。"可说"和"不可说"都是人类思维的重要表达方式,两者相互补充共同完成人类思维的表达。同时,"可说"和"不可说"具有共同的性质。"可说"和"不可说"是人类的共性表达。语言表达与非语言表达的统一性及其互补性所表现出的递归和自返特征体现了语言的非工具性质。Generally, dimensions of thought can be divided into two parts ： linguistic dimension and non - linguistic dimension. Language dimension is expressed by language and non -linguistic dimension is expressed by non -linguistic sym- bels. Language expression can be termed ＂sayable＂ and non - linguistic expression ＂unsayable＂. Both ＂sayable＂ and ＂ unsayable＂ are important ways of expression. They are in complementary distribution to express human thought. ＂Sayable＂ and ＂unsayable＂ share the features of recursive and self- reflection which shows that ＂sayable＂ and ＂unsayable＂ are unity among people of different languages. The relationship of complementary and commonness shows that language is not an instrument.

关 键 词：可说 不可说 统一性 互补性 语言非工具性 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]