检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓辉[1]
机构地区:[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学比较教育研究中心、北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院,北京100875
出 处:《比较教育研究》2009年第8期47-51,共5页International and Comparative Education
摘 要:新自由主义思潮催生了自由择校的教育改革。但自由择校并非各国学校招生的惟一模式,限制择校甚至是较多国家的政策选择。私立学校在公立学校竞争中承担着减压阀的作用。无论自由择校还是限制择校,基本着眼点都在于保证教育的基本平等。基于学生居住地划分学校招生区域的模式,确实存在着先天的不平等。自由择校虽然是对家长权利的肯定,但能否改善学习质量并惠及所有学生,促进教育平等目前尚无定论。我国择校问题的最终解决当然是教育资源的均衡化,但当前突出的问题是不公平。强化学校分区,实现法律面前人人平等是教育政策的当务之急和明智之举。The birth of neo-liberalism has led to the appearance of the educational reform of free school choice. However, free school choice is not the only enrollment pattern. More countries adopt restrictive school choice as their policy. Private schools act as pressure reducing valve in the competition among public schools. Both Free school choice and restrictive school choice focus on the importance of essential educational equality. There is indeed an innate inequality in the area-division enrollment pattern based on students' residential places. Though free school choice is an affirmation of parents' rights, it remains a question as whether it can improve the quality of learning, benefit all students and promote educational equality. In China the ultimate solution to the problem of school choice is to balance educational resources, but inequality is the pressing problem at the present time. It is an urgent and advisable task in educational policy to intensify area-division enrollment pattern and realize the goal that all are equal before the law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4