检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王德全[1]
出 处:《南方金融》2009年第8期11-15,10,共6页South China Finance
摘 要:本文应用GARCH模型和VaR方法对美元、欧元、日元和港币对人民币的四种外汇汇率进行了实证分析,得出如下主要结论:四种汇率波动率序列均为非正态平稳序列,存在显著的ARCH效应,GARCH类模型可以有效地刻画其非线性动态波动特性。四种汇率均具有自我稳定功能,且美元和港币汇率波动的持续性显著地高于欧元和日元。在日元汇率中存在显著的非对称效应,而在美元和港币汇率中存在显著的风险补偿效应,欧元和日元的汇率风险大约为美元和港币的6-7倍;欧元汇率最理想的估计模型为GARCH(1,1)和IGARCH(1,1),而美元和港币汇率的首选模型为GARCH-M(1,1)-t和GARCH-M(1,1)-g,日元汇率的首选模型为PARCH(1,1)-t和EGARCH(1,1)-g。This paper empirically studies the daily change rates of four foreign exchange: USD/RMB, EUR/RMB, JPY/RMB and HKD/RMB using the GARCH models. Based on the models, we estimate the VaR of the foreign exchange rates. Finally we draw some main conclusions: there do exist the obvious ARCH effects on all foreign exchange rates; we can select the proper GARCH models which are better fitted with the nonlinear dynamic feature of foreign exchange rates. The leverage effect does exist only in JPY/RMB, namely, the volatility is bigger when the foreign exchange rate gets soaring, and is smaller when the rate gets down. The risk compensation effect does exist in USD/RMB and HKD/RMB, and the risk of JPY/RMB and EUR/RMB is about six or seven times large than that of USD/RMB and HKD/RMB. The GARCH ( 1, 1 ) and IGARCH ( 1, 1 ) are the best models in forecasting the VaR of EUR/RMB, the GARCH-M ( 1, 1 ) -t and GARCH-M ( 1, 1 ) -g are the best models in forecasting the VaR of USD/RMB and HKD/RMB, while the PARCH ( 1, 1 ) -t and EGARCH ( 1, 1 ) -g are the best models in forecasting the VaR of JPY/RMB.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28