检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学教育科学研究院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《复旦教育论坛》2009年第5期56-61,共6页Fudan Education Forum
基 金:全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"国家助学贷款实施效益评价"(DFA050089);美国福特基金资助项目"中国学生贷款回收机制"(1045-0792)的研究成果之一
摘 要:本文基于问卷调查所得数据,考察了社会分层对高等教育公平的影响。实证结果表明,优质高等教育机会的分配仍然向国家干部、企业经理等优势社会阶层的子女倾斜,社会分层扩大了高等教育的起点不公平;优势社会阶层子女在高等教育过程中处于有利地位,社会分层扩大了高等教育过程不公平,在重点本科院校中,过程不公平程度较大,而在一般本科和专科院校中,过程不公平程度较小;优势社会阶层子女更容易获得就业机会,社会分层对高等教育的结果公平有着不利影响,在重点本科院校中,这种影响较小,而在一般本科和专科院校中,这种影响较大。文章对此提出了相应的政策建议。Based on survey data, this article studies the effect of social stratification on higher education equality. Empirical results show that as the high quality education opportunities are still tilted to children from advantaged social strata, social stratification aggravates the starting-point inequality of higher education; As children from advantaged social strata are advantageous in the process of higher education, social stratification aggravates the process inequality of higher education, and the inequality degree of top university is greater, than that of ordinary university and junior college; As children from advantaged social strata are more likely to gain employment opportunities, social stratification has negative impact on the outcome equality of higher education, and this effect is smaller for top university than for ordinary university and junior college. The article concludes with some constructive policy recommendations.
关 键 词:社会分层 高等教育 起点公平 过程公平 结果公平
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229