不同场认知风格个体的羞耻与悲伤记忆差异  

Differences Between Field-dependent and Field-independent Individuals in Shame and Sad Memories

作　　者：王觅[1] 高隽[1] 汪智艳[1] 张智丰[1] 钱铭怡[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学心理学系,北京100871

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2009年第5期570-574,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：自然科学基金(30570608);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20050001010)资助

摘　　要：目的:考察场依存、场独立个体在羞耻、悲伤记忆上是否存在差异。方法:采用自我报告的方法考察被试的羞耻、悲伤记忆。结果:①在回忆字数、提及他人次数上,情绪与场认知风格出现交互作用。②场依存个体更多的提及情绪性行为、他人在场,但场独立个体更多的报告了他人评价,差异边缘显著。③悲伤回忆中提及情绪词次数显著多于羞耻回忆,且更多的报告事件发生时间。④被试在羞耻回忆中,提及他人多于提及自我,思维中自我少于其他描述中自我。⑤场依存被试悲伤回忆中提及他人次数多于提及自我次数,思维中自我均少于其他描述中自我。⑥悲伤回忆中提到情绪性行为次数、思维句数均多于羞耻回忆。结论:本研究结果支持场独立、场依存者情绪记忆有差别的假设,并且有情绪特定的差异。Objective： To examine whether there are differences between dependent and independent individual＇s shame and sad memories. Methods： Self-report measures were used. Results： ①There were significant interactions between emotion and cognitive style of the number of words recalled, number of times that others were mentioned. ②Field dependent individuals mention more emotional behaviors and presence of others. ③The subjects mentioned more emotion words and time in sad memories.④In shame memories, there were less self-references than others-references, marginally less self in thinking than self in other descriptions.⑤In sad memories, field dependent individuals reported less self- references than others-references, and less self in thinking than self in other descriptions. ⑥There were more emotional behaviors and self-thinking in sad memories than in shame memories. Conclusion： Field dependent and independent individuals demonstrate differences in emotional memory, and the difference is emotion speeificity.

关 键 词：场依存 场独立 羞耻 悲伤 自传体记忆 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]