再论逻辑学与通识教育——与王路教授商榷  

A Further Study of Logic and the Liberal Education——A Discussion with Professor Wang Lu

作　　者：陈慕泽[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学系,北京市100872

出　　处：《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第6期42-47,共6页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要："取代论"引起的争论是混淆逻辑专业教育与通识教育的伪争论。逻辑通识课的目标是提高逻辑思维素养。逻辑思维素养是具有一般可比性的日常逻辑思维能力。现代逻辑关注逻辑之学理,普通逻辑关注日常思维,二者对同一种涉及日常思维的知识往往有不同的处理,普通逻辑的处理方式适合通识教育。"逻辑现代化"的口号是针对逻辑专业教育的。强调现代逻辑与普通逻辑的对立,是中国学界的一种特殊现象,这使得发展与改革逻辑通识教育,不得不时时为普通逻辑辩护。The debate arising from the replacement view is a pseudo argument caused by the confusion of specialty education and liberal education of logic. The goal of liberal education is to improve daily logic literacy. Daily logic literacy is the generally comparable ability of daily logical thinking. Modern logic focuses on the logic academy and the ordinary logic cares daily thinking. To deal with the same knowledge concerning daily thinking, these two always have different approaches. The approaches of ordinary logic fit liberal education. To emphasize the conflict between modern logic and the ordinary logic is a special phenomena in China which makes us have to defend the ordinary logic now and again to develop the liberal education.

关 键 词：逻辑通识教育 逻辑思维素养 批判性思维 现代逻辑与普通逻辑 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]