检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王昺[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116029
出 处:《民族教育研究》2009年第6期59-64,共6页Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities
基 金:加拿大研究发展基金项目"教育政策比较--以加拿大印第安民族和中国蒙古族为例"的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文对过去30年加拿大的印第安教育政策和我国的蒙古族教育政策进行了系统的比较,其目的是为了加强两国民族教育中的平等和多元化研究。虽然中、加两国在自治、法律保障、优惠政策、额外财政支持、语言保留等方面有很多相似之处,但在社会环境、政策过程和处理民族教育的基本方法上,还有很多不同点。本文从原住民族传统价值观出发,采用Levin提出的政策阶段分析法,对两国政策做了阶段性的分析、比较。指出了两国政策制定和落实过程中的作为与不作为情况、政策结果以及特殊做法和措施,提出了中、加两国相互学习和借鉴的建设性建议。This paper intends to make a comparison of Canada' s policy of Indian education and China' s policy of Mongolian education in the past three decades to find better ways to enhance ethnic diversity and equality in education in both countries. Though Canada and China share quite a few similarities in their policies towards Aboriginal education, such as in autonomy, legal provisions, preferential treatment, additional financing and language maintenance, they differ significantly in social environment, policy making process and basic approaches. This paper adopts a adapted version of Levin' s stage method for policy analysis, discusses policy continuity and change in different stages in the past three decades in the contexts of Aboriginal traditional values, makes a comparison of the two countries in terms of actions and in-actlons in policy-making and implementation processes, policy outcomes, as well as preferential treatment and puts forward constructive suggestions for the two countries to learn from each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28