检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈萍[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆广播电视大学,重庆400052
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第6期140-143,共4页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目(07JC51011)
摘 要:文革结束后,五四的启蒙主义传统被新时期的知识分子重新拾起。20世纪80年代初的启蒙主义与国家意识形态有合谋的倾向,因此,一些学者倾向于把1984年后的启蒙主义称为新启蒙主义。20世纪80年代新启蒙主义既有渴慕西方现代化的同质性诉求,又有对其进行批判性反思的潜在性格。20世纪90年代以来,新启蒙主义逐渐丧失批判和诊断当代中国社会问题的能力,走向了分化,但是启蒙作为一种社会批判和自我反思的文化立场和话语方式,仍然具有存在的理由。After the Cultural Revolution, the May 4th tradition of Enlightenment was resumed by the intelleetuals of new era. Early 80's enlightenment tended to conspire with the national ideology, therefore, some experts apted to nominate the Enlightenment post -1984 as New Enlightenment. New Enlightenment, not only had the demand for the homogenization with the western modernization, but also had the potential character that would critically reflect it. Since 1990s, New Enlightenment has gradually lost its capablity of the criticism and diagnosis for social problems in contemporary China. Even it goes splitted, Enlightenment still has a raison d'tre as a cultural standpoint and a mode of discourse in term of social criticism and self-reflection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3