检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张强[1]
出 处:《晋阳学刊》2010年第1期66-69,共4页Academic Journal of Jinyang
摘 要:超越传统"儒教"问题的模式大致可分为三类:用对中国传统宗教的直接探讨替代"儒教"问题的替换模式;弃用"儒教"说法,专注中国人的"信仰"和"传统"的终结模式;通过发掘儒学的"宗教性"资源来重新塑造"儒教"观念的重塑模式。尽管这些思路各有优势和局限,但都不同程度地隐含着对于儒家思想与中国文化现实发展及其出路的关怀。The modes of transcending the traditional problems of "Confucianism" could be approximately classified into three categories. They are the substituting mode in which problems of "Confucianism" could be re- placed by direct discussion on Chinese traditional religion; the terminating mode which disuses the saying of "Confucianism" and concentrates on the "belief" and "tradition" of Chinese; the re-establishing modes in which the idea of "Confucianism" is re-established by exploring the "religious" resources of Confucianism. Although there are advantages and limitation of these thoughts respectively, they all in some degree show the concern about the development and the way out of Confucianism and Chinese culture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28