同义单音节动词带宾语、补语能力比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Possibilities of Synonymous Monosyllabic Verb with Objects and Complement

作　　者：贺敬华[1] 张立丹[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆师范学院文学院

出　　处：《大庆师范学院学报》2010年第1期96-101,共6页Journal of Daqing Normal University

基　　金：黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"同义单音节动词对比研究"(1152-4002)

摘　　要：一组同义单音节动词在一般情况下词义相同,组合结构能力也相同。但有些同义词在词义相同的情况下,它们的结构能力是有强弱之分的。通过对《汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲》甲级词中的35组同义单音节动词进行封闭式研究,发现它们在带宾语、补语能力方面同中有异。A group of synonymous monosyllabic verbs mean the same in normal circumstances, and have the same structural capacity of combination. However, some synonyms have different structural capacities. Through the close study of 35 groups of synonymous monosyllabic verbs in the in ＂Chinese Grade Level Outline for Vocabulary and Chinese Characters,＂ we know that those verbs are differentiated in capacity in leading object and complement.

关 键 词：现代汉语 单音节动词 同义词 宾语 补语 

分 类 号：H07[语言文字—语言学]