检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡纯[1]
出 处:《金融理论与实践》2010年第2期64-69,共6页Financial Theory and Practice
摘 要:本文在分析本次次债危机以来主要大宗商品价格变动情况的基础上,建立了ARMA和E-GARCH模型及ARMA和TARCH模型来描述本轮经济周期中石油、铜、铝、黄金、大豆和玉米等大宗商品的期货价格收益序列的波动性特征。自相关分析发现不同商品期货市场的有效性略有差异,原油和铜市场更为有效;ARMA和非对称GARCH模型表明,主要商品收益波动均具有积聚效应,原油和铝收益波动具有杠杆效应,坏消息对原油收益波动的冲击大于好消息,好消息对铝收益波动的冲击大于坏消息。This paper has set up several ARMA-EGARCH models and ARMA-TARCH models to describe the volatility characters of crude oil, copper, aluminum, gold, soybean and corn based on the analysis about volatility trend of main commodities after subprime crisis. The analysis on the autoeorrelation finds that validities of various commodity markets are slightly different: crude oil and copper markets are more validity;ARMA and asymmetry GARCH model show that all the six commodities future return have the clustering effect ,and the volatility of crude oil and aluminum returns are asymmetric. So the effect of bad news is bigger than that of good news to the crude oil return and to the aluminum return, good news is bigger than bad news.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229