大学生网络使用利弊权衡问卷的编制  

Constructing Internet Use Decisional Balance Questionnaire in University Students

作　　者：刘勤学[1,2] 苏文亮[3] 方晓义[2] 罗喆慧[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875 [3]福州大学人文社会科学学院应用心理学系,福州350108

出　　处：《心理发展与教育》2010年第2期176-182,共7页Psychological Development and Education

基　　金：长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT0710);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-04-0147);北京市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题(AFA07095)

摘　　要：在前期访谈并结合国内外已有研究的基础上,编制网络成瘾领域的利弊权衡问卷(Internet Addiction Decisional Balance Questionnaire,简称IDBQ)。被试为选自北京市7所高校的1166名大学生,按大约2∶3的方式将被试随机分成两组(N1=441,N2=725)分别用于探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。结果表明IDBQ由好处分问卷和代价分问卷组成,其中好处分问卷维度包括放松心情、获取知识、方便交流和获得成就感;代价分问卷维度包括空虚苦恼、荒废学业、人际受损、浪费金钱。IDBQ具有良好的信度和效度指标,可以作为我国大学生网络使用利弊权衡的测量工具。The Internet Use Decisional Balance Questionnaire （IDBQ） was constructed based on our interview and other researches in this area. Data were collected from1166 Chinese undergraduate students from 7 universities. The initial sample was split randomly into two samples in proportion about 2：3 （N1 _441; N2_725）. An exploratory factor analysis （EFA） and a confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） were conducted on the two samples respectively. The results showed that IDBQ included two subscales： pros and cons. The pros subscale included 4 dimensions： mood relaxing, knowledge acquiring, communication facilitating, and achievement obtaining; the cons subscale included 4 dimensions： relationship harming, schooling abandoning, vacuous ＆ distress, and money wasting. IDBQ showed good reliability and validity and could serve as a measurement tool on university students＇ decision balance about internet use in China.

关 键 词：大学生 网络使用 网络成瘾 利弊权衡 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]